Jump to content

Talk:Napoleonic Wars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNapoleonic Wars was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 6, 2005Good article nomineeListed
September 27, 2006WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
September 10, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of August 6, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article

notes

[edit]

Infobox images

[edit]

There's too many images in the infobox, the images are too small to be meaningful (stitched together into a single image that's inconvenient to access), and the use of the imagemap isn't great I think. The imagemap prevents you from clicking each image to zoom in. The articles for each battle are already accessible in the captions. Think replacing the imagemap with a {{multiple image}} would be better. Fewer images too. seefooddiet (talk) 19:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the problem with the images in the infobox, as well as the links. If needed, please restore the links and/or image in case objected to. Thank you.
Sparkle & Fade (Talk|Contributions) 03:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An apparent anomaly

[edit]

"The Austrians began the war by invading Bavaria on 8 September 1805 with an army of about 70,000 under Karl Mack von Leiberich, and the French army marched out from Boulogne in late July 1805 to confront them." This passage suggests a direct causal link between the incursion into Bavaria in September and the movement of troops from Boulogne in July. This surely is either mistaken or misleading. Kevin McInerney (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

[edit]

The second sentence puts the blame for the Napoleonic wars on France, "The wars originated in political forces arising from the French Revolution". That would be the English point of view. In fact the term 'Napoleonic wars' already is biased. Still today people are taught the English propaganda that Napoleon was small, which he was not. Then in the next paragraph the article states "The first stage of the war broke out when Britain declared war on France on 18 May 1803, alongside the Third Coalition". Without background information this implies England is actually to blame. Aoosten (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marshal Ney in the list of Coalition leaders

[edit]

Should Ney really be on the infobox as a commander for both sides? He only served with the Bourbons for a year, never fought any battles for them and rejoined Napoleon at the first opportunity. Plus there were other marshals, like MacDonald and Berthier who stayed loyal to the Bourbons, yet they aren't on the Coalition commanders list. LordAlb (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, in fact I feel as though the entire Commanders and leaders section is clunky and difficult to navigate. 90.212.162.127 (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and made some changes to the infobox to try and make it easier to navigate. Hope it helps. LordAlb (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]