Talk:Jonathan Raban

3 Apr 2005

Made a start on this article. More details as I can find them. --Fraserspeirs (talk · contribs) 20:49, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

11 April 2007

I am a great fan of Raban's work, particularly with regard to his writing style. I have mainly read his earlier books and, with so little biographical information about him, have attempted to put together a biography (still somewhat limited) gleaned from articles and interviews. I feel that he should have far more prominence in the literary world, particularly in England, than he currently has, since he is one of the best living authors of his generation. All his books are available on Amazon at the amazon.co.uk site Ivankinsman 08:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, this is a well-made article on an author who deserves more readers in my country, too! Being a sailor myself, I particularly liked Coasting and Passage to Juneau. It’s a shame I haven’t got the time (yet) to follow these two up with Raban’s other work. Anyway: As soon as I have the time I would like to translate this article into German and post it on German WIKIPEDIA, where the present Raban entry is a rather measly one. Cheers, 87.161.180.181 14:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC) (Artur Weinhold, Germany)

Excellent and I appreciate the additions you made to the article. Let's hope there will be a wider readership for this fantastic writer! Ivankinsman 10:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

29 April 2007

Daqu (talk · contribs) Removed so-called article that offers no reason for its existence. (I'm sure it has one, but it doesn't belong in Wikipedia until it begins by explaining itself, not Mr. Raban's biography.)

There is a user called Daqu who mindlessly removed the whole article on Raban on 29th April. Can he stop vandalizing Wikipedia's content, especially all the hard work I (and others) have put in to writing this article. i have retrieed as much as I can from the history. Ivankinsman 11:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

In Daqu’s “contribution” there is not a single argument for her/his claim that the Raban article does not belong in WIKIPEDIA. So if Daqu does have arguments, we will certainly read them here. Until then, he/she should contribute positively towards an even better article – or stay away.

The same applies to whoever claims that the Raban article is an “advertisement”. This claim looks too much like the axe somebody needs to grind just for the sake of it. I challenge that classification: What are its specific arguments? What specific sentences or phrases to be found in the article “advertise” Raban the author in a commercial sense? The claim is almost too ridiculous to be taken seriously, but, alas, this is WIKIPEDIA.

With regard to the two of Raban’s books I have read (Coasting, Passage to Juneau), it is certainly possible to read and understand them without any biographical information on the person behind the books. So, nobody who is trained to read and understand needs WIKIPEDIA – good writing speaks entirely for itself. But that kind of reading and understanding is available only to the reader who is sufficiently knowledgeable about England in the 1980s, specifically about class distinctions, about Thatcher’s struggle to terminate Britain’s coal mining industry (Germany, without those class distinctions, chose an entirely different – and rather costly, but socially much less antagonizing – way to do that), about regional differences in England etc. etc. A 25-year-old from, say, Cologne or Stuttgart trying to understand Coasting will be thankful for the background information on Raban’s roots, his upbringing and education that is contained in the article; German WIKIPEDIA does not have that information because Coasting has not been translated into German – and probably never will, being the 1980s time capsule that it is.

Similarly, a reader of Passage will certainly understand the book without biographical information on the author – if he knows enough about a Briton’s fascination by America, about the 18th century ideology and motivation behind the Europeans’ “discovery” of North America’s indigenous peoples, and about the specific style of Raban’s writing in Passage, a style that encompasses the objectiveness of quasi-scholarly research and documentation on the one hand and the subjectivity of a modern writer’s ability and willingness to allow elements of his personal life to reflect intellectual as well as emotional experiences and situations on the other. After all, Passage is (also) a book about just that: a passage from one state of being to another. Nobody who does not get to know about the Briton Raban’s becoming a U.S. citizen and about his separation from his wife in the course of his making the Passage will sufficiently understand those aspects of the book. If there is any sense in WIKIPEDIA, an article about Raban will provide that information and, doing so, will try to get beyond the blurb on the cover – as the Raban article here does. -- Artur Weinhold 17:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

2 May 2007

Jonathan Raban here. I'm flattered by, and grateful for, the work put into this article by its several contributors. May I make a couple--or three--flyspeck points? Missing ISBN number for "Surveillance" is 978-0-375-42244-7. I did an honours degree in English at Hull, not one in English and Drama. Hull U. also awarded me an honorary D. Litt in 2005 (ref: www.hull.ac.uk/05/pdf/aboutus/news/may/index.pdf+Raban+hull+doctorate&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us). Bibliography is a bit incomplete. It misses out "God, Man and Mrs Thatcher" (1989), also three early critical books: "The Technique of Modern Fiction" (1968), Mark Twain: Huckleberry Finn (1968), and "The Society of the Poem" (1971). It'd be wrong of me to edit an article about me, but I'd be happy to see someone else make some or all of these very minor corrections. Best to all, Nabarj 23:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

JR: I see nothing wrong in your editing Wikipedia articles about yourself. In fact, the Wiki bylaws, as I understand, encourage that. Who else knows your life history and (admirable) work better than you do? pulrich (talk · contribs) 02:28, 31 May 2007

Actually, aside from uncontroversial corrections of facts and trivial/cosmetic edits, there is a lot wrong with it, and such behavior can get you blocked from editing ... please see Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for details.

FYI, there is currently a case being debated at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding User:Douglas Carswell, a British Member of Parliament, who made extensive and controversial edits to the article about himself ... Happy Editing! —68.239.79.82 07:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Raban again, with a PS. Artur Weinhold, above on this page, says I'm an American citizen. In fact I remain a British citizen, but have permanent resident status (with a green card) in the U.S.. Nabarj (talk · contribs) 23:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Have made additions to bibliography and amendments to biographical detail. Ivankinsman 14:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Jonathan, having been born in England myself, allow me to quibble a bit: Shouldn't that be British subject, rather than citizen? (Myersdtm 17:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC))

Myersdtm: No, I just checked my passport. Under "nationality" it says: "British Citizen."Nabarj 00:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Jonathan, quite right of course. My passport says the same. I'd forgotten about the Nationality Act and all that. This idea of being a subject rather than a citizen was drummed into my cranium (unfortunately, not to be dislodged) when I was growing up in Surrey. Thanks for taking the time to respond. Love your work! (66.191.160.194 14:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC))

I've no idea why wikipedia signed me out during the above edit. (Myersdtm 14:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC))

13 May 2007

Artur - please leave in Waxwings (novel) and Surveillance (novel) and Coasting (book) so that they connect through to the plot summary pages. If you take novel out, they go through to the definitions of these words. Plus, how is the German Wikipedia article coming along? Ivankinsman (talk · contribs) 09:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Ivankinsman and all the other Raban collaborators – sorry, I had no intention of destroying any links! I thought the categorizing of Coasting as book was a bit strange. O.K., if it is necessary to link the entry to other WIKIPEDIA articles, I won’t meddle. By the way: Does Waxwings have to come in inverted commas? As a publication in its own right (and not part of a publication), italicization without any inverted commas will surely do. Anyway, I had better stay away from that part of the article. :-))) On the matter of the German WIKIPEDIA article on Raban – sorry, I haven’t got the time (yet). I started a translation of this English-language article before it was abridged two or three weeks ago but stopped all work once it became apparent that something was going on with this article. The last thing I can stand at the present – having to shoulder a larger-than-usual workload in my regular job until early summer – is investing a lot of work in a German Raban article and then finding the English article drastically changed or having to fight the German article through an irrelevancy discussion or some such nonsense. Also, an enlarged German Raban article will have to be based on some research specific to how Raban has been received in Germany; that takes a bit of time. Finally, I would not want to enlarge the German Raban article just on the basis of having read only two of his books. So – the German article will have to wait for a number or reasons! Cheers – Artur Weinhold (talk · contribs) 20:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

30 May 2007

That's cool that Jonathan Raban uses wiki and comments on his biography.

I think he's one of the finest travel writers I've come across and even better than Paul Theroux. "Arabia: A Journey Through the Labyrinth" was superb: great eye for detail and the truly bizarre as well as the idiosyncratic.

If JR reads these notes, I was wondering: while you were at Hull University, did you ever know a John Ure? - Pulrich (talk · contribs) 00:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Discussion/Talk page etiquette

Hello ... I stumbled across this article while doing some WikiGnome cleanups on Waxwings (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and felt that you nuggets deserved my 2¢ worth.

First of all, I found this Discussion page unreadable because there were (a) no headings to break up the threads, and (b) no indentations to separate comments from replies ... I started by adding a {{talkheader}} (which is the Very First Thing that you should do when you create a Talk page) ... this provides a Click here to start a new topic link to create meaningful section headers for new threads.

In the absence of any meaningful subject/headlines, I considered things like, Vandalism - page blanked and Comment by the article's subject, but decided to KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) instead ... I used the date of the first comment in each thread as the headers when I broke up the discussions into sections.

Kudos to you all for signing your posts! ... I did not have to use any {{unsigned2}} templates to identify your contributions. :-)

I have modified some of your signatures using {{User}} ... this provides the wikilinks to the user's Talk page and their Contributions ... it just reduces the number of places you have to click to find out this information, and using it yourself is purely a courtesy ... OTOH, using the ":" (colon) for indentation in replies is considered Good Etiquette for being able to follow conversations ... each one used moves your comment one level to the right.

Anywho, I'm going to follow some more "What links here" links in articles related to this author, make some more cosmetic improvements, and then I plan to MOVE ON.

In the mean time, Grasshopper, just remember ... there was a time when I knew even less about this wiki-stuff than you do at this very moment, so don't be afraid to Be BOLD! ... that's how you learn.

Happy Editing! —68.239.79.82 (talk · contribs) 20:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

This is extremely poor form

If I were a pleasant, polite person like Jonathan Raban is (I'm not), and I didn't know what Wikipedia was, and I stumbled upon an article about me on the Internet, and all of a sudden I'm being yelled at about Wikipedia policies, I'd be entirely disillusioned. I of course agree that Mr, Raban is a notable person and an entirely suitable subject for an article, and I agree he shouldn't write his own article, but there's no cause to be incivil or unwelcoming. Ben-w 07:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

For the record (Raban here), I checked with Wikipedia before contributing to the Talk page and was assured that it was in order to do so. I wouldn't dream of trying to edit the article itself. In fact I don't feel "yelled at", and think the guidelines set out by USER:68.239.79.82 are entirely appropriate. I'd instinctively distrust any article written or edited by its subject. But I gratefully appreciate Ben W's concern for my injured sensibility, which is probably a lot tougher than he seems to think! Nabarj 20:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

British Council Contemporary Writers Website

This is a good website and for some reason Jonathan Raban is not on it. I am trying to get him listed as have no idea why a writer of his calibre does not feature. This was the reply from the British Council so I will keep people posted:

'We currently have over 200 authors on the waiting list to be added to the Contemporary Writers site. The site is primarily in support of our work overseas and therefore includes authors we work with plus major prizewinners from the UK and Commonwealth. I keep a note of authors that we consider should be added to the site (plus those that have asked to be added to the site) and an editorial board meets twice a year to decide whether they should be included or not. After we have prepared the author entry we contact the author for approval. We can only add between 5-10 authors every month so the waiting time can be considerable. Having followed your link to the Wikipedia page, I would agree that Mr. Raban is entirely qualified to be added to the site, and as such will add him to the waiting list. Hopefully, we can add him as soon as possible.' Ivankinsman (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Yoenit (talk) 23:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

A message to a very heavy-handed editor (Yoenit)

Jonathan Raban Article

Can I also ask why you have removed the information I wrote about Jonathan Raban? I SPENT A HUGE AMOUNT OF MY OWN TIME AND EFFORT WRITING THIS PROFILE. I am sick of editors like you and MoonRiddenGirl simply deleting articles and/or stripping them down to their bare bones. Why was this article not put to a general forum of editors to review before you changed it? What give you the right to simply delete important and interesting biographical information relevant to an author and simply leave boring, bare facts? Who can I appeal to on this issue - I know that whatever I say to you or Moonriddengirl will simply be ignored. I also am fully confident that you will remove this from this talk page as part of your totalitarian editing policies. Ivankinsman (talk) 09:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

for anybody interested, moonriddengirl replied to these accusations here. Yoenit (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Family connection to Evelyn Waugh?

I was reading EW's article and noted that:

Family background

Arthur Evelyn St. John Waugh was born on 28 October 1903 to Arthur Waugh (1866-1943) and Catherine Charlotte Raban (1870-1954), into a family with English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish and Huguenot origins. Wondering if there is a blood connection with JR? Ivankinsman (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Evelyn Waugh and Jonathan Raban are both descended from John Caspar Raban (1736-1813). John was Evelyn's gt.gt.gt. grandfather and Jonathan's gt.gt.gt.gt. grandfather.

Evelyn's descent:

John Caspar Raban 1736-1813

Thomas Raban 1761-1811

Maj. Henry Tilman Raban 1799-1838

Henry Charles Biddulph Cotton Raban 1837-1871

Catherine Charlotte Raban 1870-1954

Arthur Evelyn St. John Waugh 1903-1966

Jonathan's descent:

John Caspar Raban 1736-1813

Col. William Raban 1765-1843

Maj. Gen. Herbert Raban 1820-1887

Rev. Francis William Raban 1854-1888

Harry Priaulx Raban 1880-1959

Rev. James Peter Caplin Priaulx Raban 1918-1996

Jonathan Mark Hamilton Priaulx Raban 1942-2023

I hope this helps. LOY1917 (talk) 06:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan Raban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021433/http://www.bookcritics.org/?go=pastAwards to http://www.bookcritics.org/?go=pastAwards
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050831031541/http://www.thomascookpublishing.com/ba_prev_winners.htm to http://www.thomascookpublishing.com/ba_prev_winners.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://blog.theartsfuse.com/2007/03/06/kicking-off-the-podcast/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071006221327/http://www.researchchannel.org/prog/displayevent.aspx?rID=2581 to http://www.researchchannel.org/prog/displayevent.aspx?rID=2581

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan Raban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.penusa.org/docs/Master%20List%20of%20PEN%20USA%20Awardees.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014032319/http://www.pnba.org/1997%20Awards.htm to http://www.pnba.org/1997%20Awards.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326112926/http://www.aitkenalexander.co.uk/author.php?recordID=267 to http://www.aitkenalexander.co.uk/author.php?recordID=267
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070512200435/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/writers/writer.asp?userid=QC7NdzDBTS&cid=1186056 to http://www.barnesandnoble.com/writers/writer.asp?userid=QC7NdzDBTS&cid=1186056

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

sailing

I think the article is great but could give more emphasis to sailing. Raban was a sailor and his books Coasting and Passage to Juneau are innovative in dealing with yachting in a political and historical perspective. 74.14.15.161 (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)